Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34344
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarringer, Sheryl-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-13T08:46:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-13T08:46:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-30-
dc.identifier.citationSinir, G.Ö. vd. (2020). "Botanical and geographical origin of Turkish honeys by selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry and chemometrics". Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(5), 2198-2207.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-5142-
dc.identifier.issn1097-0010-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10244-
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jsfa.10244-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/34344-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Honey has a very important commercial value for producers as a natural product. Honey aroma is formed from the contributions of several volatile compounds, which are influenced by nectar composition, botanical origins, and location. Selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) is a technique that quantifies volatile organic compounds simply and rapidly, even in low concentrations. In this study, the headspace concentration of eight monofloral (chestnut, rhododendron, lavender, sage, carob, heather, citrus, and pine) and three multiflower Turkish honeys were analyzed using SIFT-MS. Soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA) was used to differentiate honey samples based on their volatiles. RESULTS This study focused on 78 volatile compounds, which were selected from previous studies of selected honeys. Very clear distinctions were observed between all honeys. Interclass distances greater than 8 indicate that honeys were significantly different. Methanol and ethanol were abundant in the honeys. Chestnut honey collected from the Yalova region had the highest total concentration of volatiles followed by heather honey and chestnut honey collected from the Duzce region. CONCLUSION Honeys with different botanical and geographical origins showed differences in their volatile profile based on chemometric analysis. Of the honey samples, methanol, ethanol, acetoin, ethyl acetate, and isobutanoic acid had the highest discriminating power. Methanol and ethanol, and then acetic acid, were the volatiles with the highest concentrations in most honeys.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.subjectFood science & technologyen_US
dc.subjectChemistryen_US
dc.subjectSift-msen_US
dc.subjectHoney aromaen_US
dc.subjectChestnuten_US
dc.subjectHeatheren_US
dc.subjectWildfloweren_US
dc.subjectSolid-phase microextractionen_US
dc.subjectVolatile profileen_US
dc.subjectUnifloral honeyen_US
dc.subjectMarkersen_US
dc.subjectComponentsen_US
dc.subjectLavenderen_US
dc.subjectChestnuten_US
dc.subjectFlavoren_US
dc.subjectCitrusen_US
dc.subjectThymeen_US
dc.subject.meshAcetatesen_US
dc.subject.meshAcetic aciden_US
dc.subject.meshEthanolen_US
dc.subject.meshFlowersen_US
dc.subject.meshGas chromatography-mass spectrometryen_US
dc.subject.meshGeographyen_US
dc.subject.meshHoneyen_US
dc.subject.meshMass spectrometryen_US
dc.subject.meshMethanolen_US
dc.subject.meshMultivariate analysisen_US
dc.subject.meshOdorantsen_US
dc.subject.meshTurkeyen_US
dc.subject.meshVolatile organic compoundsen_US
dc.titleBotanical and geographical origin of Turkish honeys by selected-ion flow-tube mass spectrometry and chemometricsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000507805400001tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85078244372tr_TR
dc.relation.tubitakTÜBİTAK (2219)tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Gıda Mühendisliği Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3954-0058tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage2198tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage2207tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume100tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue5tr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of the Science of Food and Agricultureen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorSinir, Gülşah Özcan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇopur, Ömer Utku-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAF-3324-2020tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8336-2021tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed31901138tr_TR
dc.subject.wosAgriculture, multidisciplinaryen_US
dc.subject.wosFood science & technologyen_US
dc.subject.wosChemistry, applieden_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ1 (Agriculture, multidisciplinary)en_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid8228159600tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusHoney; Stingless Bees; Botanyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAcetic aciden_US
dc.subject.emtreeAcetic acid ethyl esteren_US
dc.subject.emtreeAlcoholen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFragranceen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMethanolen_US
dc.subject.emtreeVolatile organic compounden_US
dc.subject.emtreeChemistryen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFloweren_US
dc.subject.emtreeGeographyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHoneyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMass fragmentographyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMass spectrometryen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMultivariate analysisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (bird)en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sinir_vd_2020.pdf297.27 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons