Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/32216
Title: Renal autotransplantation at three academic institutions in Turkey
Authors: Yakupoğlu, Yarkın Kamil
Aki, Fazıl Tuncay
Özden, Ender
Tonyalı, Şenol
Bostancı, Yakup
Bilen, Cenk Yücel
Sarıkaya, Şaban
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı.
Kordan, Yakup
Vuruşkan, Hakan
9633365800
6507328150
Keywords: Urology & nephrology
Kidney autotransplantation
Kidney
Laparoscopy
Transplantation
Trauma
Ureter
Ureteral replacement
Safety wire
Reconstruction
Appendix
Disease
Kidney
Transplantation
Interposition
Ureteroscopy
Nephrectomy
Issue Date: 18-Jul-2016
Publisher: Karger
Citation: Yakupoğlu, Y. K. vd. (2016). "Renal autotransplantation at three academic institutions in Turkey". Urologia Internationalis, 97(4), 466-472.
Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study is to present the experience of 3 institutions performing renal autotransplantation (RAT) and to discuss surgical techniques employed and the results in the light of the medical literature. Materials and Methods: A total of 14 patients (11 male and 3 female) with a mean age of 47 +/- 8 years (35-61 years), who underwent RAT procedure at 3 different institutions between October 2006 and November 2014, in Turkey, were evaluated retrospectively. Indications for RAT procedure are ureteral avulsion, renal artery aneurysm and intimal dissection caused by percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty (PTRA). Twelve patients with ureteral avulsion, 1 patient with renal artery aneurysm and 1 patient with intimal dissection caused by PTRA were followed-up for 103 months. Seven (50%) open and 7 (50%) laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed. Nine patients (64.3%) were right-sided and 5 patients (35.7%) were left-sided. Complications of grade III and above as per Clavien-Dindo classification were assessed. Results: Mean time from injury to RAT was 21.2 +/- 40.1 days. However, 5 (35.7%) patients were treated on the same day of the injury. As per Clavien-Dindo classification, 2 (14.2%) grade IVa and 1 (7.1%) grade IIIa complications were reported. However, no significant correlation was observed between the complications and graft loss regarding type and side of the nephrectomy performed (p = 0.462 and p = 0.505, respectively) and timing of the intervention (p = 0.692). Conclusion: RAT is a safe procedure in combination with minimally invasive laparoscopic technique in carefully selected patients; however, it requires expertise and proficiency in laparoscopy, reconstructive urology and transplantation. Nevertheless RAT should be considered as the last resort, when other modalities fail.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000448482
https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/448482
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/32216
ISSN: 0042-1138
1423-0399
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.