Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30268
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T07:06:33Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-05T07:06:33Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-01-
dc.identifier.citationKadirov, R. vd. (2017). ''Penile plication with or without degloving of the penis results in similar outcomes''. Sexual Medicine, 5(3), E142-E147.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2050-1161-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.esxm.2017.05.001-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S205011611730034X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/30268-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Penile plication techniques with or without degloving offer a minimally invasive option for the treatment of penile curvature. Aim: To review the outcomes of penile plication surgery and patient satisfaction with and without degloving of the penis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 52 patients who underwent penile plication for the treatment of Peyronie disease or congenital penile curvature. Outcomes: Surgical success rates, complications, and patient satisfaction determined with the Treatment Benefit Scale were compared between groups. Results: The overall surgical success rate was 92.3% at a mean follow- up of 18.84 +/- 23.51 months. There were no intraoperative complications. In the degloving group, 42.6% of patients were greatly satisfied and 42.6% had better outcomes; in the without degloving group, 61.5% of patients were greatly satisfied and 30.8% had better outcomes. Comparison of outcomes was not statistically significant between groups. Clinical Implications: The results of the present study indicate the two techniques can be used for penile plication. Conclusion: With or without degloving, penile plication is safe and effective and provides high patient satisfaction.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectGeneral & internal medicineen_US
dc.subjectUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.subjectCongenital penile curvatureen_US
dc.subjectDeglovingen_US
dc.subjectPenile plicationen_US
dc.subjectPeyronie's diseaseen_US
dc.subjectPeyronies-diseaseen_US
dc.subjectTunical plicationen_US
dc.subjectCurvatureen_US
dc.subjectDeformitiesen_US
dc.titlePenile plication with or without degloving of the penis results in similar outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000410676800002tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85023601545tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9790-7295tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8673-3093tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpageE142tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpageE147tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume5tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue3tr_TR
dc.relation.journalSexual Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorKadirov, Rüstam-
dc.contributor.buuauthorCoşkun, Burhan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKaygısız, Onur-
dc.contributor.buuauthorGünseren, Kadir Ömür-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKordan, Yakup-
dc.contributor.buuauthorYavaşçaoğlu, İsmet-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKılıçarslan, Hakan-
dc.contributor.researcheridL-9439-2019tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9704-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAM-9726-2020tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridABC-9924-2020tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed28711404tr_TR
dc.subject.wosMedicine, general & internalen_US
dc.subject.wosUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.contributor.scopusid57194857067tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid36113105900tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid16637252400tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56664496600tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid9633365800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603612497tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56007473800tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusPeyronie Disease; Clostridiopeptidase A; Penisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeClinical effectivenessen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDegloving plication techniqueen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFoley balloon catheteren_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeIntermethod comparisonen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLength of stayen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMinimally invasive surgeryen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOperation durationen_US
dc.subject.emtreePatient satisfactionen_US
dc.subject.emtreePenile plicationen_US
dc.subject.emtreePeyronie diseaseen_US
dc.subject.emtreePostoperative perioden_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRetrospective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurgical techniqueen_US
dc.subject.emtreeUrologic surgeryen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kadirov_vd_2017.pdf503.84 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons