Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29594
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-11-28T11:15:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-11-28T11:15:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Budak, B. A. vd. (2016). "Comparing the ocular surface effects of topical vancomycin and linezolid for treating bacterial keratitis". Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 35(2), 126-130. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1556-9527 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1556-9535 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2015.1058273 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/15569527.2015.1058273 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29594 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Vancomycin is the gold standard in combination therapy for severe and resistant gram-positive keratitis and in particular for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. The aim of this study was to report the ocular surface toxicity and scoring in patients whose treatment shifted to topical linezolid/ceftazidime from topical vancomycin/ceftazidime due to their vancomycin intolerance. Methods: A retrospective, interventional case series of bacterial keratitis was treated with topical linezolid (one drop of 0.2% solution per eye), administered hourly until epithelization and then gradually decreased. The number and extent of punctate epithelial erosions were noted across the entire surface of the cornea. Ocular discomfort was assessed by means of (a) patient-reported pain upon instillation of the medication (vancomycin/linezolid), (b) reported burning sensation between doses and (c) reported foreign-body sensation. No ocular surface toxicity related to linezolid use was noted. Patients were followed for at least 2 months after treatment between April and December 2013. Results: Of the seven patients included in the study (age range: 2-88 years; five females, two males), complete epithelization and resolution was achieved in five patients. One patient was treated with linezolid after penetrating keratoplasty. The second culture of another patient with impending perforation despite linezolid/ceftazidime therapy yielded Fusarium spp., so he underwent tectonic keratoplasty. The mean ocular surface score was 9.4 +/- 1.6 during vancomycin treatment and 5.9 +/- 1.3 during linezolid treatment after discontinuation of vancomycin. The topical linezolid score was significantly lower (p = 0.027). Conclusions: Topical linezolid may be better tolerated, according to the mean ocular surface score, than topical vancomycin by some patients and can be considered an alternative for patients who do not well tolerate vancomycin. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Ophthalmology | en_US |
dc.subject | Toxicology | en_US |
dc.subject | Linezolid | en_US |
dc.subject | Vancomycin | en_US |
dc.subject | Keratitis | en_US |
dc.subject | Resistant staphylococcus-aureus | en_US |
dc.subject | Efficacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Safety | en_US |
dc.subject | Model | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 and over | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Anti-bacterial agents | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Child, preschool | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Eye | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Gram-positive bacterial infections | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Keratitis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Linezolid | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Vancomycin | en_US |
dc.title | Comparing the ocular surface effects of topical vancomycin and linezolid for treating bacterial keratitis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000372497500008 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84961795045 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-0995-5260 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-0932-6977 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 126 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 130 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Budak, Berna Akova | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Baykara, Mehmet | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kıvanç, Sertaç Argun | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Yılmaz, Hakan | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Çiçek, Serhat | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAH-6518-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | ABE-3033-2020 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | ABI-7051-2020 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 26100380 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Ophthalmology | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Toxicology | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indexed.pubmed | PubMed | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q4 | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 55370489800 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 23093006700 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 47861204900 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 57188580909 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 57188593392 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Keratitis; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Besifloxacin | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Ceftazidime | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Ciprofloxacin | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Linezolid | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Moxifloxacin | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Vancomycin | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Antiinfective agent | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Linezolid | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Vancomycin | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Antibiotic therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Bacterial keratitis | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Blepharospasm | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Burning sensation | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Case study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Child | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Clinical article | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Comparative study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Disease course | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug dose reduction | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug effect | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug substitution | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug tolerability | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug withdrawal | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Epithelization | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Eye discomfort | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Follow up | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Human | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Intervention study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Keratopathy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Ocular surface disease | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Penetrating keratoplasty | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Photophobia | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Preschool child | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Retrospective study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Very elderly | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug effects | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Eye | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Gram-positive bacterial infections | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Keratitis | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Pathology | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.