Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29582
Tüm üstveri kaydı
Dublin Core AlanıDeğerDil
dc.contributor.authorRantell, Angie-
dc.contributor.authorCardozo, Linda-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-28T05:56:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-28T05:56:32Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-23-
dc.identifier.citationOrhan, A. vd. (2020). "Social media awareness among non-urogynecologists regarding the current mesh discussions in urogynecology: A survey study". International Urogynecology Journal, 31(6), 1231-1243.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0937-3462-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04242-3-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-020-04242-3-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/29582-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction and hypothesis There has been a great deal of discussion about mesh complications in urogynecology in recent years. However, awareness of other doctors who are not urogynecologists is unknown. This study was aimed at determining the level of awareness of mesh discussions among medical doctors whose specialty is not urology or gynecology. Methods A survey study was administered, and all medical doctors, except gynecologists and urologists, were invited. Respondent doctors were classified into four groups: King's College Hospital (KCH), UK; Uludag University Hospital (UUH), Turkey; the United States (USA); and the world (WORLD). The primary outcome was the awareness of mesh discussion in urogynecology, and the secondary outcome was the social media awareness of the mesh discussion. Results 1231 doctors responded to the survey. The awareness of the current mesh problems among the respondent doctors was 15.8% in KCH, 15.4% in UUH, 26.9% in the USA, and 16.2% in WORLD. The social media awareness about mesh problems was 20.8% in KCH, 20.3% in UUH, 32.8% in the USA, and 20.6% in WORLD. Although there were no differences among three of the groups with regard to primary and secondary outcomes, the USA group score was statistically significantly higher than the others. Conclusions Social media can influence doctors' thinking on controversial academic issues. In this survey study, non-urogynecologist doctors in the USA cohort have higher awareness levels and a higher social media awareness level than other groups.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMesh complicationsen_US
dc.subjectMesh discussionen_US
dc.subjectPractical survey studyen_US
dc.subjectPelvic organ prolapseen_US
dc.subjectUrinary-incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectWomenen_US
dc.subjectObstetrics & gynecologyen_US
dc.subjectUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.subject.meshGynecologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshSocial mediaen_US
dc.subject.meshSurgical meshen_US
dc.subject.meshSurveys and questionnairesen_US
dc.subject.meshTurkeyen_US
dc.subject.meshUnited Statesen_US
dc.titleSocial media awareness among non-urogynecologists regarding the current mesh discussions in urogynecology: A survey studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000516272300001tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85079727380tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği/Ürojinekoloji ve Pelvik Rekonstrüktif Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9277-7735tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7558-8166tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage1231tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage1243tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume31tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue6tr_TR
dc.relation.journalInternational Urogynecology Journalen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorOrhan, Adnan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzerkan, Kemal-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKasapoğlu, Işıl-
dc.contributor.buuauthorOcakoğlu, Gökhan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorAslan, Münir Kiper-
dc.contributor.buuauthorMert, Sevde Nur-
dc.contributor.buuauthorUncu, Gökhan-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAT-3479-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAER-7173-2022tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9791-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9694-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-5180-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridV-5292-2019tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed32067058tr_TR
dc.subject.wosObstetrics & gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.wosUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid56671094200tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603345841tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid55800494800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid15832295800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56740498500tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57215021844tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603716169tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusSacrocolpopexy; Pelvis Floor; Hymenen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGynecologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLaw suiten_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMedical device complicationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.emtreePhysicianen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProfessional knowledgeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSocial mediaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSupport groupen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (republic)en_US
dc.subject.emtreeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.emtreeUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.emtreeUrologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGynecologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeQuestionnaireen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurgical meshen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (bird)en_US
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür:Scopus
Web of Science

Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Bu öğeyle ilişkili dosya bulunmamaktadır.


DSpace'deki bütün öğeler, aksi belirtilmedikçe, tüm hakları saklı tutulmak şartıyla telif hakkı ile korunmaktadır.