Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/28303
Title: Lack of complete regression of the Day 5 corpus luteum after one or two doses of PGF2α in nonlactating Holstein cows
Authors: Nascimento, Aníbal Ballarotti
Souza, Alexandre H.
Filho, Roberto Sartori
Wiltbank, Milo Charles
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Veterinerlik Fakültesi/Klinik Bilimler Bölümü.
Keskin, Abdülkadir
AAH-3831-2021
24473229800
Keywords: Prostaglandin
Luteolysis
Dairy cow
Corpus luteum
Timed artificial-insemination
Gonadotropin-releasing-hormone
Messenger-rna
Pregnancy rate
Early-phase
Blood-flow
Prostaglandin-f2-alpha
Synchronization
Protocol
Expression
Reproductive biology
Veterinary sciences
Bos
Corpus luteum
Issue Date: 1-Feb-2014
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Citation: Nascimento, A. B. vd. (2014). "Lack of complete regression of the Day 5 corpus luteum after one or two doses of PGF2α in nonlactating Holstein cows". Theriogenology, 81(3), 389-395.
Abstract: The early corpus luteum (CL) (before Day 6) does not regress after a single PGF(2 alpha) treatment. We hypothesized that increasing PGF(2 alpha) dose or number of treatments would allow regression of the early CL (Day 5). Nonlactating Holstein cows (N = 22) were synchronized using the Ovsynch protocol. On Day 5 (Day 0 = second GnRH treatment), cows were assigned to: (1) control (N = 5): no further treatment; (2) 1PGF (N = 6): one dose of 25 mg PGF(2 alpha); (3) 2PGF (N = 5): two doses of 25 mg PGF(2 alpha) (50 mg) given 8 hours apart (second PGF(2 alpha) on Day 5 at the same time as the other PGF(2 alpha) treatments); (4) DPGF (N = 6): double dose of 25 mg PGF(2 alpha) (50 mg) given on Day 5. Blood samples were collected to monitor progesterone (P4) profiles in two periods. In the first period (0 to 24 hours), there were effects of treatment (P = 0.01), time (P < 0.01), and an interaction of treatment and time (P = 0.02). Group 1PGF versus control was different only at 12 hours (P = 0.02). Cows treated with DPGF were different than control at 4 hours (P = 0.04), 12 hours (P < 0.01), and 24 hours (P < 0.01). Only cows treated with 2PGF had lower P4 than control during the entire period and low P4(0.37 +/- 0.17 ng/mL) at 24 hours, usually indicative of luteolysis. In the second period (Day 5 to 15 of the cycle), there were effects of treatment (P < 0.01), time (P < 0.01), and interaction of treatment and time (P = 0.002). Group 1PGF was not different than control from Day 5 to 13 and P4 was greater than control on Day 14 (P = 0.01) and 15 (P < 0.01). Circulating P4 in DPGF cows was lower than control from Day 7 (P = 0.05) through 12 (P < 0.01). Likewise, there were differences between control and 2PGF from Day 7 to 13, but not on Day 14 and 15. On Day 15, all PGF(2 alpha)-treated groups had circulating P4 consistent with an active CL. Ultrasound evaluation confirmed that no CL from any group completely regressed during the experiment and no new ovulations occurred to account for functional CL later in cycle. In summary, a double dose of PGF(2 alpha) (twice on Day 5 or 8 hours apart) can dramatically decrease P4, consistent with classical definitions of luteolysis; however, these CL recover and become fully functional. Thus, the Day 5 CL of mature Holstein cows do not regress even to two doses of PGF(2 alpha).
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.10.009
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093691X13004184
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/28303
ISSN: 0093-691X
1879-3231
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.