Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25181
Tüm üstveri kaydı
Dublin Core Alanı | Değer | Dil |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-18T08:16:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-18T08:16:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Karakaş, E. vd. (2009). "Effects on reproductive parameters of cosynch, ovsynch and ovsynch plus cosynch administration in unobserved estrous cows and heifers". Cattle Practice, 17(1), 84-89. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0969-1251 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25181 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study was carried out to compare effects on the pregnancy rates achieved by timed AI (TAI) of cosynch, ovsynch and cosynch+ovsynch protocols in lactating dairy cows (60 d postpartum) and heifers (16-18 m old) in which the state of estrus is not determined. In group I (cosynch) cows (n: 97) and heifers (n: 43) were treated with an intramuscular. injection of synthetic GnRH (10 mu g) on day 0.7 d after the GnRH injection they were given an i.m. injection of PGF(2)alpha (25 mg) and a second injection of GnR-H (10mg) 48 h after the PGF(2)alpha injection. All cows and heifers were served by TAI at the second GnRH injection. In group 11 (ovsynch) cows (n: 94) and heifers (n: 43) were treated as in group 1, but TAI was performed about 16 h after the second GnRH injection. In group III (cosynch+ovsynch) cows (n: 95) and heifers (n: 43) were treated as in group 11 and 1, but double TAI was performed. The first TAI was administered at the time of the second GnRH injection and the second TAI was administered about 18-20 h later. Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal palpation after similar to 45 d following AI. Pregnancy rates for heifers in group III were significantly greater than in group 1. The pregnancy rate was numerically greater for cows in group 111, but it was not significantly different from those in group I and II. The effect of treatment on the total pregnancy rate was similar in all three treatment groups. However, the total pregnancy rate was higher in group III than in group I and II. Combining pregnancy results of all treatment groups, the pregnancy rate for heifers with a corpus luteum (CL) was significantly greater than without a CL. In summary, in dairy herds which have poor detection of estrus, in unobserved estrous dairy heifers treated with a GnRH-PGF(2)alpha-GnRH protocol and double TAI can achieve significantly greater pregnancy rates than those using the cosynch procedure. In addition, pregnancy rates in heifers can probably be improved by more careful time of the second AI. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | British Cattle Veterinary | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cosynch | en_US |
dc.subject | Cosynch+ovsynch | en_US |
dc.subject | Cows | en_US |
dc.subject | Heifer | en_US |
dc.subject | Ovsynch | en_US |
dc.subject | Pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject | Unobserved estrus | en_US |
dc.subject | Gonadotropin-releasing-hormone | en_US |
dc.subject | Lactating dairy-cows | en_US |
dc.subject | Artificial-insemination | en_US |
dc.subject | Holstein cows | en_US |
dc.subject | Timed-ai | en_US |
dc.subject | Postpartum | en_US |
dc.subject | Synchronization | en_US |
dc.subject | Ovulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Gnrh | en_US |
dc.subject | Performance | en_US |
dc.subject | Veterinary sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | Bos | en_US |
dc.title | Effects on reproductive parameters of cosynch, ovsynch and ovsynch plus cosynch administration in unobserved estrous cows and heifers | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000264313400016 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-62349102127 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Yenişehir İbrahim Orhan Meslek Yüksekokulu. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Veteriner Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 84 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 89 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Cattle Practice | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Karakaş, Emin | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Nak, Yavuz | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Nak, Deniz | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAH-5494-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Veterinary sciences | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q4 | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 12243636400 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 8615464000 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 9280090000 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Artificial Insemination; Estrus; Cattle | en_US |
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür: | Scopus Web of Science |
Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Bu öğeyle ilişkili dosya bulunmamaktadır.
DSpace'deki bütün öğeler, aksi belirtilmedikçe, tüm hakları saklı tutulmak şartıyla telif hakkı ile korunmaktadır.