Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25100
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kıran, Gürkan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kesterson, Joshua P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kanis, Margaux Jenna | - |
dc.contributor.author | Groman, Adrienne E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lele, Shashikant B. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-16T13:16:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-16T13:16:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Kesterson, I. vd. (2011). "Evaluation of the outcome benefit conferred by intensive surveillance strategies in women with early-stage endometrial cancer". Gynecologic Oncology, 121(1), Supplement 1, S11-S12. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0090-8258 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.032 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.gynecologiconcology-online.net/article/S0090-8258(10)00915-7/fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25100 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The optimum follow-up regimen after treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer with curative intent is unknown. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends a physical exam and vaginal cytology every three to six months for two years then at six to 12 month intervals with annual chest X-rays (CXR). However, there is debate as to whether intensive follow-up results in an improvement in outcomes for those with recurrent endometrial cancer. Objective: To determine if intensive surveillance for recurrent cancer in women with early-stage endometrial cancer improves their outcomes. Materials and Methods: The Roswell Park Cancer Institute tumor registry was used to identify patients with Stage I and II endometrial cancer initially diagnosed and treated over an 18-year period, who subsequently recurred. Clinico-pathological variables were abstracted. Patients were divided into two groups, depending on their mode of diagnosis of recurrent cancer: 1) routine screening, or 2) symptomatic. The outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results: Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty-three patients were diagnosed via routine screening methods and 29 were symptomatic at presentation. Groups were equally represented with respect to age, stage, grade, adjuvant therapy, site of recurrence (local, distant), and time to recurrence (p > 0.05). Median survival time was 79 months for those diagnosed during routine screening and 80 months for symptomatic patients (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Pap smear and CXR appear to be of limited utility as the present study has shown that women diagnosed as a result of intensive surveillance did not have a better outcome than those who presented when symptomatic. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Oncology | en_US |
dc.subject | Obstetrics & gynecology | en_US |
dc.subject | Endometrial cancer | en_US |
dc.subject | Surveillance | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Asymptomatic diseases | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Disease-free survival | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Early detection of cancer | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Endometrial neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Kaplan-Meier estimate | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasm recurrence, local | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Neoplasm staging | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Population surveillance | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Radiography, thoracic | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Time factors | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Vaginal smears | en_US |
dc.title | Evaluation of the outcome benefit conferred by intensive surveillance strategies in women with early-stage endometrial cancer | en_US |
dc.type | Meeting Abstract | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000290292300026 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84898862874 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | S11 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | S12 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 121 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 10, Supplement 1 | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Gynaecological Oncology | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Özerkan, Kemal | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAH-9791-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.collaboration | Yurt içi | tr_TR |
dc.relation.collaboration | Yurt dışı | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Oncology | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Obstetrics & gynecology | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q1 (Obstetrics & gynecology) | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q2 (Oncology) | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 6603345841 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Fluorodeoxyglucose F 18; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Cancer adjuvant therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Cancer center | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Cancer diagnosis | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Cancer epidemiology | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Cancer recurrence | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Cancer screening | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Cancer staging | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Clinical evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Clinical feature | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Early cancer | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Endometrium cancer | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Follow up | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Human | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Major clinical study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Outcome assessment | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Papanicolaou test | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Patient identification | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Thorax radiography | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Vagina cytology | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Asymptomatic disease | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Disease free survival | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Early diagnosis | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Endometrium tumor | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Health survey | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Kaplan Meier method | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Pathology | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Time | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Tumor recurrence | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Vagina smear | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.