Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23033
Title: Unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in 157 mares: A retrospective multicenter study
Authors: Roecken, Michael
Mosel, Gesine
Litzke, F.
Verver, Jorrit
Rijkenhuizen, Astrid B. M.
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Veterinerlik Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı.
Seyrek-İntaş, Deniz
Seyrek-İntaş, Kamil
AAH-7292-2019
6506990178
6603409870
Keywords: Veterinary sciences
Granulosa-cell tumors
Stapling device
Removal
Electrocoagulation
Complications
Hemostasis
Colpotomy
Surgery
Horses
Issue Date: Dec-2011
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Rocken, M. vd. (2011). "Unilateral and bilateral laparoscopic ovariectomy in 157 mares: A retrospective multicenter study". Veterinary Surgery, 40(8), 1009-1014.
Abstract: Objective: To evaluate surgical techniques, perioperative complications and outcome of laparoscopic surgery for unilateral and bilateral ovariectomy in mares. Study Design: Retrospective multicenter case series. Animals: Mares (n = 157). Methods: Indications for surgery were neutering, fertility problems, elimination of hormone-related abnormal behavior, ovarian tumors as well as nonregressive ovarian hematomas or cysts. Ovariectomy (n = 206) were performed by a standard laparoscopic procedure in 157 standing sedated mares. Dissection and hemostasis were achieved by using either (1) a linear stapling device, (2) bipolar electrosurgical instruments, with or without a modified Roeder knot, (3) a vessel-sealing system, or (4) a diode-laser with ligation. For some larger ovarian masses (>20cm diameter), a 2-step surgical procedure was used with standing flank laparoscopic ovariectomy followed by ovarian retrieval through a median celiotomy. Surgical techniques, outcome, and perioperative complications of each method were recorded and analyzed. Results: Laparoscopic dissection of the ovary was accomplished in all mares. Because of the size of the ovarian tumor (n = 7) or in 1 mare with behavioral problems (n = 1), the dissected ovary was removed through a median celiotomy under general anesthesia. Seventeen mares (10.8%) developed postoperative complications (eg, incisional drainage, incisional infection, seroma formation, dehiscence, transient fever and mild abdominal discomfort). All mares with flank incisional problems had ovarian size >12 cm and in 15 (88%) of these mares electrosurgical instruments were used for mesovarial dissection. Conclusions: Laparoscopic ovariectomy in standing sedated mares provides good surgical access and is associated with low morbidity.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00884.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00884.x
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23033
ISSN: 0161-3499
1532-950X
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.